Some people scoff at the idea of handing over in excess of five Franklins for a “point and shoot” camera – “you can pay half the price and get the same result!” Honestly, that’s almost certainly true. Few of these cameras will allow you to do more than a camera that costs $175; some functions may be easier to use, but most of the difference is in the higher-quality construction, design, and general aesthetics/haptics. A lot of the premium pricing of these cameras is also based on brand name, marketing upon release that advertised these as the best-of-the-best, comparative availability, etc.
Read MoreLeaving Nikon Part One: Why and to Where?
I’ve shot Nikon as my primary system since I left Canon behind in 2012. I’ve owned and used cameras from, as far as I can tell, every current manufacturer save Phase One. Some stuck with me longer than others – I have pretty limited experience with Pentax DSLRs, for example. I’ve never been a brand loyalist in any sense; the idea of that is just silly no matter how you look at it….
Read MoreSigma Fp-L Rumor: Let's Talk About Sensor Tech
The rumor mill is churning – as it does every day – with specifications of the upcoming Sigma Fp-L. The release of this successor model itself is almost certain, but these sensor specs are not. However, I wanted to talk a little bit about the sensor and its design and why it’s very exciting technology – and also how it’s based on a 30-year-old innovation…..
Read More